Get your new 5.0

[4.slow!]

 

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/5Qc4Xb7G1ck&rel=0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/5Qc4Xb7G1ck&rel=0</a>

[SVTJerry]

That's badass! I completely forgot what I was doing after watching that video.

[MachMe]

ok............i think i missed some'n.....................that wasnt stock right!

[lude2evo]

no it had 375whp and 404wtq and slicks and broke 11.8.

[red_mach1]

fuckin bad ass......yea its stock, prolly exhaust,  a tune an the slicks an skinnies

[MachMe]

yea factory to the fly it puts 412hp so 375 to the wheels is understandable for stock

no it had 375whp and 404wtq and slicks and broke 11.8.

[MachMe]

i say exhaust more likely i doubt a tune jus yet, the ran it on the dyno stock an ran the track stock tires then with MTs thats fucking baddd ass!!!!

fuckin bad ass......yea its stock, prolly exhaust,  a tune an the slicks an skinnies

[lude2evo]

yea factory to the fly it puts 412hp so 375 to the wheels is understandable for stock

it would lose alot more than that throught the drivetrain. wasnt your dynojet when u had your first round of mods like 268whp. and your 2004 mach1 has 310 crank hp from the factory. so we'd be talking about, about 350 crank hp and you made 268whp

[MachMe]

it would lose alot more than that throught the drivetrain. wasnt your dynojet when u had your first round of mods like 268whp. and your 2004 mach1 has 310 crank hp from the factory. so we'd be talking about, about 350 crank hp and you made 268whp

my engine wasnt designed like these new engines, stock it made 353 an 375 tunes it made 363 an 404 the car only has a tune an they swaped the tires which was the major difference, that 5.0 is bare bone stock, these mustang engine arent like 99-04 engines they make more power an lose less from the fly, that 08 carbon gt mike his car was all stock made 295whp an those came with 305hp at the DM dyno day, you cant compare my car to this car the technology behind this model 4v is far more advanced then mine

[lude2evo]

its not the engine im speaking of. it still has a rwd driveshaft.

[lude2evo]

but yes the tires was the only thing that got it that low. the tune got it out of the 13sec range and intoa  12.6

[MachMe]

but yes the tires was the only thing that got it that low. the tune got it out of the 13sec range and intoa  12.6

 the tune took it from a 12.8 to a 12.6 those cars run high 12's consistently like i said these new model cars are putting more power to the wheels stock then mine did, an im talk about the power loss from the drive shaft too, RAD gonna get their hands on one an dyno it stock, and get its true stock numbers before building one

[lude2evo]

its still going to have drivetrain loss, fwd cars have their axels right near the trans and lose more than 10hp through them. if the numbers that everyone claims for example are true then a fwd that losses 10% at 300hp would make 280whp(not the case its more than that) a rwd that losses 25% at 300hp would make 225whp and an awd that losses 35% at 300hp would make 195whp

[4.slow!]

The first run was all factory stock, the second is with a tune and MTs and skinnies.

[MachMe]

The first run was all factory stock, the second is with a tune and MTs and skinnies.

 that was car bare bone stock, the only thing done to it was tires an a tune, i know about the loss percent more so since i have a stalll on the car, this 5.0 was dyno stock 353 ran a 12.8(factory time) with a tune made 363 an ran 12.6 (factory tires) swapped the tire an it ran a 11.8, the car was stock dude i mean i dont know what else to tell you other then accept it, you said it had 375, i corrected you when i saw the vid again 412 base to the fly an 353 before tune and 363 after tune with tires made it run 11's....get it ? got it? good!!!

[lude2evo]

actually watching the video again i was wrong about the power. min is on the left max on the right. i mixed up the hp and trq numbers. 52 sec in i read ont he max side 405WHP and 375WTQ. lmao. all that power and torque and it barely made a time similar to your mustang.... kinda sad if you ask me, only because your numbers are lower. now it is a mostly stock car so it impresses me more that it is capable of that(finally) factory times. slicks are slicks though.
you get a pretty good veiw of the chart at 58 sec in. still that means that the 412 base hp only made 368 and 352 right outta the gun. at least that what the dyno says......
so the statement about it would only lose 10hp was inncorrect, and i was inccorrect, i said it has less power than it really does... bwhahahahahaha

[4.slow!]

that was car bare bone stock, the only thing done to it was tires an a tune, i know about the loss percent more so since i have a stalll on the car, this 5.0 was dyno stock 353 ran a 12.8(factory time) with a tune made 363 an ran 12.6 (factory tires) swapped the tire an it ran a 11.8, the car was stock dude i mean i dont know what else to tell you other then accept it, you said it had 375, i corrected you when i saw the vid again 412 base to the fly an 353 before tune and 363 after tune with tires made it run 11's....get it ? got it? good!!!

Are you quoting me or lude2evo? Cause I don't understand your reply.

[MachMe]

ok i see what you mean about the power but also take into consideration that it ran those times on 19s with street tires an i rans that time on 17s with DRs so sad? no good? hell yea no granted if i buy the samt MTs with skinnies ill run a lot faster time but i doubt ill break 11 N/A like that one did

actually watching the video again i was wrong about the power. min is on the left max on the right. i mixed up the hp and trq numbers. 52 sec in i read ont he max side 405WHP and 375WTQ. lmao. all that power and torque and it barely made a time similar to your mustang.... kinda sad if you ask me, only because your numbers are lower. now it is a mostly stock car so it impresses me more that it is capable of that(finally) factory times. slicks are slicks though.
you get a pretty good veiw of the chart at 58 sec in. still that means that the 412 base hp only made 368 and 352 right outta the gun. at least that what the dyno says......
so the statement about it would only lose 10hp was inncorrect, and i was inccorrect, i said it has less power than it really does... bwhahahahahaha

[StacyLeah]

dont care to read...

is this all usual "im right" junk?